Qatar hands Iran a new draft deal with a seven-day plan to end the war

Qatari mediators have given Iran a new draft agreement intended to bring the war to an end, according to an official cited by The Times of Israel and The Jerusalem Post. Both outlets attributed the account to a single unnamed official and described the step as part of an ongoing mediation effort.

Israeli broadcaster N12, relaying a report by the Reuters news agency, said the Qatari mediation team put the new draft to Iran on Sunday, and Tehran is expected to send back its answer before the week is out. The Hebrew-language news site Ynet carried a similar alert, saying Iran is expected to sit down by the weekend to consider a further draft of an agreement to end the war.

What the draft reportedly contains

The most detailed description of the proposal so far comes from the N12 posts, which cite the official quoted in the Reuters report. According to N12, the draft now under review in Iran lays out a seven-day timetable, designed to respond to concerns raised by both Tehran and Washington. The mention of Washington indicates that the United States is one of the parties whose positions the draft seeks to address, although the reports do not set out what those concerns are on either side.

The same source said the text specifies confidence-building measures that each side would be required to carry out day by day. The official added that the timetable could begin to be put into effect early next week, and that several countries would serve as guarantors of the agreement. None of the reports names those countries or explains what role a guarantor would play.

Qatar as a go-between

Qatar is a small Gulf state whose capital is Doha. It has positioned itself as an intermediary between parties that do not deal with each other directly, and the current reports place it at the centre of efforts to reach an agreement involving Iran. A photograph published alongside The Jerusalem Post report shows Qatar's ruler, Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, shaking hands with Iran's interior minister, Eskandar Momeni, in Doha. The caption dates that meeting to October 6, 2026, which indicates that senior Iranian officials have been in direct contact with the Qatari leadership in recent weeks. The reports do not say whether that meeting was connected to the draft now on the table.

Why the timetable matters

Proposals built around short, staged timetables are a common feature of ceasefire and de-escalation diplomacy. Breaking an agreement into small daily steps lets each side test whether the other is keeping its commitments before moving on, which is the stated purpose of the confidence-building measures described in the N12 posts. Outside guarantors are often added to such arrangements to give both sides an external party to turn to if the other side is seen to fall short. The reports describe these elements only in outline, and none of them publishes the draft itself.

How the reports differ

The sources broadly agree that Qatar delivered a new draft and that Iran is expected to respond soon, but they frame the next step slightly differently. N12, citing Reuters, says Tehran is expected to deliver its reply by the end of the week. Ynet describes Iran as expected to sit down and examine another draft by the weekend, which speaks to deliberation rather than a formal response. Ynet's wording also describes this as a further draft, suggesting earlier versions have been exchanged, while the English-language outlets call it a new deal. The Times of Israel and The Jerusalem Post items available to us carry only the headline claim and do not add the detail on the timetable or guarantors, which comes solely through N12's account of the Reuters report.

What the reports do not say

Several basic points remain unclear from the material available:

• The official who described the draft is not named, nor is it stated which government or body they represent.
• The reports do not specify which war the agreement is meant to end or list all of the parties to it, beyond references to the concerns of Tehran and Washington.
• No Iranian, Qatari or American government has publicly confirmed the draft in the reports we have seen.
• The content of the daily confidence-building steps is not described.
• The countries that would act as guarantors are not identified.
• There is no indication of Israel's position on the proposal or whether Israel was consulted.
• It is not stated how this draft differs from any earlier versions.

Israel.com will update this report as further official statements emerge.